考研英语中新题型是一种以快速阅读为完成条件的阅读类题型补充，主要是考查考生对连贯性、一致性等文章结构的理解，因此新题型的解答需要理解文章的短路大意，新题型每年都是大家比较担心的失分点，所以大家还是要多做题来熟悉题型套路，好轻松考研小编整理了2005年考研英语一新题型真题及答案解析，希望对大家有帮助。

　　Canada 's premiers (the leaders of provincial governments),if they have anybreath left after complaining about Ottawa at their late July annual meeting, mightspare a moment to do something, together, to reduce health-care costs.

　　They're all groaningabout soaring health budgets，the fastest-growingcomponent of which are pharmaceutical costs.

　　41._______

　　What to do? Both the Romanow commission and the Kirby committee on healthcare -- to say nothing of reports from other experts -- recommended the creation of anational drug agency. Instead of each province having its own list of approved drugs,bureaucracy, procedures and limited bargaining power, all would pool resources, workwith Ottawa, and create a national institution.

　　42._______

　　But “national”doesn't have to mean that.“National”could mean interprovincial-- provinces combining efforts to create one body.

　　Either way, one benefit of a "national”organization would be to negotiate betterprices，if possible，with drug manufacturers. Instead of having one province -- or aseries of hospitals within a province -- negotiate a price for a given drug on theprovincial list, the national agency would negotiate on behalf of all provinces.

　　Rather than，say，Quebec，negotiating on behalf of seven million people，thenational agency would negotiate on behalf of 31 million people. Basic economics suggests the greater the potential consumers, the higher the likelihood of a better price.

　　43._______

　　A small step has been taken in the direction of a national agency with the creation of the Canadian Co-ordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment,funded by Ottawa and the provinces. Under it, a Common Drug Review recommends to provincial lists which new drugs should be included. Predictably, and regrettably,Quebec refused to join.

　　A few premiers are suspicious of any federal-provincial deal-making. They (particularly Quebec and Alberta) just want Ottawa to fork over additional billions with few, if any, strings attached. That's one reason why the idea of a national list hasn't gone anywhere, while drug costs keep rising fast.

　　44._______

　　Premiers love to quote Mr. Romanow's report selectively, especially the parts about more federal money. Perhaps they should read what he had to say about drugs:“A national drug agency would provide governments more influence on pharmaceutical companies in order to constrain the ever-increasing cost of drugs.""

　　45._______

　　So when the premiers gather in Niagara Falls to assemble their usual complaint list, they should also get cracking about something in their jurisdiction that would help their budgets and patients.

　　[A] Quebec's resistance to a national agency is provincialist ideology. One of the first advocates for a national list was a researcher at Laval University.Quebec's Drug Insurance Fund has seen its costs skyrocket with annual increases from 14.3 per cent to 26.8 per cent!

　　[B] Or they could read Mr. Kirby's report:“the substantial buying power of such an agency would strengthen the public prescription-drug insurance plans to negotiate the lowest possible purchase prices from drug companies."

　　[C] What does “national” mean? Roy Romanow and Senator Michael Kirby  recommended a federal-provincial body much like the recently created National Health Council.

　　[D] The problem is simple and stark: health-care costs have been, are, and will continue to increase faster than government revenues.

　　[E] According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, prescription drug costs have risen since 1 997 at twice the rate of overall health-care spending.Part of the increase comes from drugs being used to replace other kinds of treatments. Part of it arises from new drugs costing more than older kinds.Part of it is higher prices.

　　[F] So, if the provinces want to run the health-care show, they should prove they can run it, starting with an interprovincial health list that would end duplication, save administrative costs, prevent one province from being played off against another, and bargain for better drug prices.

　　[G] Of course, the pharmaceutical companies will scream. They like divided buyers; they can lobby better that way. They can use the threat of removing jobs from one province to another. They can hope that, if one province includes a drug on its list, the pressure will cause others to include it on theirs. They wouldn't like a national agency, but self-interest would lead them to deal with it.

      答案解析：

　　41. [答案] [E]

　　[解析]因果关系。空格前面提到加拿大各省官员都在抱怨医疗预算的飞涨,尤其是药品费用的不断增长。空格后面的内容则由"what to do"引出下文对此问题的解决办法。可以看出两段内容衔接紧密，因此空白处的内容也须和"药品费用"有关。浏览各选项，只有E选项提到了"药品费用",包括药品价格上涨的幅度和具体表现，恰好为上一段提到的“药费"上涨提供了依据，构成因果逻辑关系。

　　42. [答案] [C]

　　[解析]转折关系。空格前面提到建立国家药物管理机构，空格后面则以"but"引出了转折，说"国家"不一-定指那个意思，接下来就表述了它的一一个概念，即各省联合起来成立的一个机构。可知，空白处的内容应是对“国家"的一个解释,而代词"that"即指代这一概念。

　　43. [答案] [G]

　　[解析]顺接关系。空格前面谈到成立国家机构来争取降低药品的价格,如从经济学角度讲，潜在客户群越大，获得优惠价格的可能性就越大。空后讲到成立国家代理机构后取得的一项小突破。据上下文逻辑关系推断,空白处内容也应围绕成立国家代理机构而展开。浏览各选项,提到"national agency"或同义词的有A,B, G,而对于B项中出现的指代词"they",无法从上文中找到所指代的相应名词,所以排除。A项最易误选,因为它和上文都提到了专有名词Quebec,但其内容主要是魁北克地方保护主义的表现和药品上涨的情况，与前后内容不衔接,因此不对。G选项涉及医药公司对设立国家药物机构的反应,表明其成立具有现实可能性，与下文所取得的进展存在着内容与逻辑上的一致性。

　　44. [答案] [F]

　　[解析]顺接关系。空格前面讲到某些省对联邦政府和省政府之间的交易持怀疑态度,空格后则指出这些省长们应该读读报告中有关药品的论述，了解成立国家药物机构的好处。可以推断，空白处内容要么是继续讨论来自这些省份的阻力,即承上;要么是建议他们更多了解成立国家机构的意义,即启下。符合条件的有B和F两项,但由于B项开头的并列连词"or" 使其无法与上文衔接,因此不对。F项虽然把上文的关键词"premiers'换成了"provinces",但其内容还是建议各省实.现全国药物代理机构的功能，与上下文内容逻辑关系紧密。

　　45. [答案] [B]

　　[解析]对照关系。空前指出省长们应该读读Romanow的报告，B项则提到读- -读Kirby的报告，结构与上文类似，且还重复运用了关键词"report", 即暗含两份报告存在意义上的相似或相反特征。另外,两个专有名词Mr. Romanow和Mr. Kirby都已在第四段中被提到，他们都提倡建立国家药物代理机构。

　　以上就是小编整理的2005年考研英语一新题型真题及答案解析，考研中每一分对我们都很重要，大家要重视每一个板块的练习哦。